Here is an
article by a teacher who has rethought homework. His comments are good and
worth reading. I have a few comments of my own, regarding the points that he
makes.
In his first
point, Mr. Spencer talks about giving after school help to students who are
struggling. I have no question that, in today’s environment, struggling kids go
home with assignments they cannot manage. They stare at them blankly and end up
getting zeros for the work they cannot done. So to move “homework” into the
school with a teacher present, is a major step forward to helping kids out. But
it is also important to keep in mind that people generally put their energies
into the things that they do best. We ask, in fact demand, that children go to
school and learn things they may find hard. To expect that they will give up
time and stay in after school is over, and learn, is a large expectation. If we
are going to ask them to stay after school, it is incumbent that the time be
planned and well spent. I think a lot of “after school” help is unfocused. It
comes at the end of the school day when the teacher may be tired and ready to
go home, and may require that the student be able to articulate what he does
not understand and finds hard to do. There may be several students there and
the teacher may not have considered what each student needs before he has
arrived. There is risk that the extra help is not helpful at all. Before acting
on point one (a point with which I generally agree), it is important for the
teacher to consider how that time will be used, and what is needed so that a
short period of time with a tired student (and possibly a tired teacher) is
truly productive. If the student does not experience the time as helpful, it
will feel like a detention and become counterproductive.
It is also
important when considering this point that some students are not going to come
to the after school help session. Do we fail them? Or do we consider,
educationally, how to best teach them (even if they learn less than other
students) with the time we have them in class? This calls for a professional
consideration of how to help, in class, students who lag behind.
The other point
that generates a comment from me is Mr. Spencer’s last point, “Empower parents
with the skills to push for authentic learning at home.” This sentence is
followed by “Teach them …” I think Mr. Spencer’s point would have been stronger
if he stopped with the first sentence. There may be some parents who are open
to being taught, but parents are adults with lots of things to do. They know
what they know, and that may be enough. So I would keep the emphasis on “empower,”
which, for me, carries the notion that the parent is the one in charge of the
home. If teachers accepted the fact that parents were the ultimate authorities
on all matters in the home, they would have to rethink homework, in particular,
and teaching, in general, with that concept in mind. Once teachers accept that
they have no right to enforce behaviors in the home, they will adapt and come
up with superior teaching techniques that bank, primarily, on the time they
have with the students in their class.
Those points
notwithstanding, this is a find article and worth your read.
For more information on Dr. Goldberg's model, read other postings on this blog, visit his website, The Homework Trap, or read his book, The Homework Trap: How to Save the Sanity of Parents, Students and Teachers.